GetIntel's own AI visibility, tracked live
We built GetIntel to track whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews actually cite you. So we run it on ourselves, on the same 60 buyer questions real prospects ask. No composite score to hide behind: here are the exact prompts, who gets cited instead of us, and where those citations actually come from.
Snapshot as of September 17, 2026 · a single day · 179 AI answers across 4 engines
9.4%
of AI answers mention GetIntel
3.3%
share of voice against every brand named
#1.5
average position on the answers that do name us
Honest read: last of the five brands the product surfaces, on 9.4% against Profound's 30.6%.
Profound is mentioned in 30.6% of these answers, Semrush 24.4%, Otterly.AI 19.4%, Peec AI 18.9%. We're on 9.4%, last of the five. The one number that flatters us is position: when an engine does name us we sit at #1.5 on average, so the problem is being named at all, not where we land. This page exists to show the real number, not a flattering one, and to show exactly what we're doing about it below.
Visibility over time, us against the field
Share of AI answers mentioning each brand, at the three dates this page has published figures for. Every point is a real reading.
We are the only line going up, 0.8% to 7.5% to 9.4%, and we are still last. Every competitor fell across the same three readings, Otterly.AI hardest, from 53.3% down to 19.4%. We would rather show that than claim the gap closed because we improved: we gained 8.6 points and Otterly lost 33.9, so most of the convergence is them coming down. A field-wide fall over two months is more likely the category churning than four companies each getting worse at once.
Who actually gets cited on these 60 prompts
Same prompt set, same window of a single day, every named tool we track against ourselves.
2 of the 13 prompts where we do show up
Real buyer questions, real citation frequency across the last 2 runs each (AI answers vary run to run, so we track repeat hits, not a single lucky check).
“What tool lets me see which Reddit threads or G2 reviews AI engines are pulling brand recommendations from?”
“I found an AI visibility gap but the fix is sitting in my backlog for weeks. Is there a tool that generates ready-to-ship artifacts like llms.txt or schema automatically?”
Where AI actually pulls citations from in this category
Across 15,967 sources behind 9,007 tracked AI answers in the AI-visibility-tool category, read 18 September 2026. Each figure is the share of answers citing that domain, not a share of all citations, so they do not sum to 100: one answer can cite several domains. The right-hand column is the move since our 24 August reading of the same measure.
Reddit is cited in 20% of answers and YouTube in 19%, the two largest single sources by far, and Reddit is the one that moved, down 3 points since August. Two competitor domains (otterly.ai, tryprofound.com) still crack the top 10. Category-wide, our own domain accounts for 1% of citations, tracked competitors 12%, third parties 87%. If your GEO plan is "publish more on our own blog," this is still the data that says it isn't the highest-leverage move.
What we're doing about it
Given where citations actually happen (Reddit 23%, YouTube 19%, LinkedIn 12%, per the breakdown above), our own priority is building real presence on those three, not writing more blog posts hoping our own domain gets cited directly. That means genuine participation in the communities where this exact buying decision gets discussed, an actual YouTube presence, and a completed G2 and Product Hunt profile, before anything else.
Domain rating (56) and technical foundation (llms.txt, structured data, AI-crawler access) are already in reasonable shape. The gap is still mostly on the earned, third-party side: the citation sources above, not our own site.
We'll update this snapshot as the real numbers move, and we're not going to round up in the meantime. If the next check still shows 13 of 60, that's what we'll publish.
How we measure
GetIntel probes ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini with the same 60 buyer-intent questions real prospects ask in the AI-visibility-tool category: things like "best AI search visibility tool for SaaS founders" and "how do I track whether ChatGPT mentions my brand." For each probe we capture the real answer as shown in the engine's own interface, not a sanitized API response, and record who got cited, verbatim.
Every number on this page traces back to a specific probe, on a specific prompt, on a specific date. Nothing here is a composite or an index we can quietly redefine if it stops moving in our favor.
Watch this number move
We update this page as the real numbers change. Drop your email and we'll send the next snapshot, whichever direction it moves.
No other emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
Run this on your own SaaS.
Connect your domain. We track your buyer-intent questions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, show you exactly which ones cite you and which cite competitors instead, and turn the gaps into a task list your coding agent can work through. Free score in about 2 minutes.