GetIntel's own AI visibility, tracked live
We built GetIntel to track whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews actually cite you. So we run it on ourselves, on the same 60 buyer questions real prospects ask. No composite score to hide behind: here are the exact prompts, who gets cited instead of us, and where those citations actually come from.
Snapshot as of July 15, 2026 · 7-day window · 240 probes across 4 engines
2/60
tracked buyer prompts cite GetIntel
4
AI engines probed: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini
240
probes run in the last 7 days
Honest read: we're losing the citation race in our own category.
Otterly AI gets cited on 53% of these exact prompts. Profound on 45%. We're at 0.8%. This page exists to show the real number, not a flattering one, and to show exactly what we're doing about it below.
Who actually gets cited on these 60 prompts
Same prompt set, same 7-day window, every named tool we track against ourselves.
The 2 prompts where we do show up
Real buyer questions, real citation frequency across the last 5 runs each (AI answers vary run to run, so we track repeat hits, not a single lucky check).
“Is there an LLM SEO tool that drafts counter-articles or schema markup automatically when it detects my brand is missing from AI recommendations?”
“As a SaaS founder, how do I evaluate which AI search visibility tool will actually move the needle on getting recommended by ChatGPT versus just showing me a dashboard?”
Where AI actually pulls citations from in this category
Across 4,838 sources behind 1,139 tracked AI answers in the AI-visibility-tool category. Not our domain, not a competitor's domain: this is who the engines actually trust.
Reddit and YouTube alone account for 65% of citations. Zero come from vendor domains directly. If your GEO plan is "publish more on our own blog," this is the data that says it isn't the highest-leverage move.
What we're doing about it
Given where citations actually happen (Reddit 33%, YouTube 32%, LinkedIn 15%, per the breakdown above), our own priority is building real presence on those three, not writing more blog posts hoping our own domain gets cited directly. That means genuine participation in the communities where this exact buying decision gets discussed, an actual YouTube presence, and a completed G2 and Product Hunt profile, before anything else.
Domain rating (51) and technical foundation (llms.txt, structured data, AI-crawler access) are already in reasonable shape. The gap is entirely on the earned, third-party side: the citation sources above, not our own site.
We'll update this snapshot as the real numbers move, and we're not going to round up in the meantime. If the next check still shows 2 of 60, that's what we'll publish.
How we measure
GetIntel probes ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini with the same 60 buyer-intent questions real prospects ask in the AI-visibility-tool category: things like "best AI search visibility tool for SaaS founders" and "how do I track whether ChatGPT mentions my brand." For each probe we capture the real answer as shown in the engine's own interface, not a sanitized API response, and record who got cited, verbatim.
Every number on this page traces back to a specific probe, on a specific prompt, on a specific date. Nothing here is a composite or an index we can quietly redefine if it stops moving in our favor.
Watch this number move
We update this page as the real numbers change. Drop your email and we'll send the next snapshot, whichever direction it moves.
No other emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
Run this on your own SaaS.
Connect your domain. We track your buyer-intent questions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, show you exactly which ones cite you and which cite competitors instead, and draft the fix. Free score in about 2 minutes, no credit card.